In light of the parish’s informational change in leadership meeting held on 9/30, I feel compelled to give my opinion.
Unfortunately, Wayne and I were unable to attend, so I am relying on information from several parishioners who attended the meeting to gain perspective on how some of the congregation is reacting.
I understand that there are many who feel that these changes will have a positive impact and many who feel that these changes will have a negative impact.
The future of our Church is at stake, and my opinion is this: any change that will keep our church open can be considered not only very positive for our parish community, but a huge asset to all of us as well. If our church becomes a shrine, that is even better and more welcomed news.
To have our humble Franciscans in charge of our shrine will have a more positive and successful outcome. We do not lose our identity; we gain character, personality, uniqueness. We do not lose our church; we gain a more diverse community, more spiritual guidance, more devotions, more opportunities for spiritual growth.
We keep our sodalities, our feasts, our Masses. How can any of this be construed as negative? We are the Church, and our Church needs us more than ever. We need positivity; we need dedication; we need everyone’s support to make this leadership change successful.
I checked the website of the St. Joseph the Worker Shrine in Lowell; there are three Masses EVERY day and the shrine is staffed with three priests! Imagine how wonderful it would be to have something even close to this same schedule! How can this possibly be a negative in any way?
I do understand that many are opposed to change, especially when it comes to our church “home”, but these changes that hopefully come to fruition will be the best scenario for us, especially considering the times we are in. To hear that our church will stay open is angelic music to my ears, so I humbly implore all who are struggling with these proposed modifications to please put the negativity to rest, and try to be a part of the solution, not part of the problem.
I will close with this daunting thought: if these changes do not happen due to the congregation’s negativity, obstruction and opposition, be prepared for what the alternative will be.
Connie Pickles